Blame FIFA For Referee Mistakes at the World Cup

With a couple of harsh dismissals and one disallowedhave a point, as many football fans can recall
goal from the USA/Slovenia match, referees haveMaradona's "hand of God."
again managed to be the scapegoats. FIFA's refereeUEFA experimented with two extra match officials
committee at the World Cup decided that the Germanduring the Europa league. This might have ensured that
referee (Stark) for the Argentina/Nigeria game shouldHenry's match-winning handled-ball during the playoff
have disallowed the goal. While a referee must ownagainst the Republic of Ireland. FIFA does not seem
his mistakes, there is the cogent argument that FIFAlikely to yield to calls from former players, fans and
should take some of the "credit" for the refereeanalysts for video replays and additional help for
performances at the World Cup.match officials in the near future.
Referee selectionAdvice to referees and secrecy
FIFA decided that they would give referees from allFootball match officials are not required to explain their
confederations a chance to do World Cup matches.match decisions openly. In many instances, officials are
The quality of refereeing across the world is not evendiscouraged from doing this publicly, since it would
by any means. Better officials tend to come out ofappear to undermine their competence and authority.
Europe and South America. This is no surprise sinceFIFA does this behind closed doors and the
Europe and South America have the best leagues.performance of referees is routinely assessed.
Therefore, the top referees from these leaguesHowever, the FIFA referees committee might
officiate in top-flight matches with crowded stadia andnegatively influence officiating at the World Cup. They
television scrutiny.criticized W. Stark of Germany for allowing Argentina's
Officials from Mali and New Zealand are less likely togoal against Nigeria at the 2010 World Cup because
have these opportunities. Any referee could make aan Argentine player impeded a Nigerian defender.
mistake, but what one does not want is a refereeIn the match against the USA, Malian referee Koman
making errors because he is unaccustomed to aCoulibaly disallowed a US goal because he likely felt
certain level of football and the level of skill among thethat the US players were obstructing the Slovenian
world's best players. Referee selection also applies todefenders. Replays did not support this view. If
the referees selected within confederations. Even theanything, it seemed as though the Slovenians were the
best confederations have some questionable FIFAprotagonists in the penalty-area tussle. Perhaps the
officials. However, the World Cup requires the bestadvice to referees to look out for such infraction
referees with experience. Perhaps FIFA could increasemade Coulibaly prejudiced in that particular situation, to
the age for FIFA referees by a year or two to ensurethe point where he disregarded the infraction by the
that they have a wider pool of experienced refereesSlovenians.
from which to choose.FIFA needs to do more about officiating at the highest
No additional help for match officialslevel. Football will always have some controversy and
Even the most anachronistic of sports (cricket)video replays are not necessarily a universal panacea.
currently uses technology to improve the standard ofHowever, FIFA's secret handling of referee errors,
officiating. FIFA adamantly rejected the use of goal-linewithout admitting when officials make mistakes is not
technology and repeatedly refused to entertain thehealthy for the game. When referees make major
idea of video replays, suggesting that it would slowmistakes, FIFA (and referees) should at least be able
down the pace of the game. Sepp Blatter, FIFA'sto admit that. For all the aforementioned reasons, FIFA
president, even suggested that referee errors and themust take some discredit for the performance of
resultant controversy provide a talking point. He mightreferees at the World Cup.